<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg.com PR0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/</link>
	<description>SEO insiders share all on SEO news, tips and theories.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:32:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hyena Online</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyena Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 03:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>If you are not allying with g oogle then you should be
prone to manual lowering of your sites&#039;s pr.

That means doing no evil to allies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are not allying with g oogle then you should be<br />
prone to manual lowering of your sites&#8217;s pr.</p>
<p>That means doing no evil to allies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-857</guid>
		<description>Just to be sure everyone is clear on this, this did correct itself after a short time, as I assumed it would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be sure everyone is clear on this, this did correct itself after a short time, as I assumed it would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadiejane</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>sadiejane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-854</guid>
		<description>I also noticed that MySpace lost its PR.

After that I began observing more carefully, and am shocked at the big sites that mysteriously lost all their page rank.  

We are seeing sites go from PR 7 or 6  -  to PR 0, 
not being dropped down slightly... just booted.

I find it quite unsettling, like changing the rules in the middle of the game, but not announcing what the new rules are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also noticed that MySpace lost its PR.</p>
<p>After that I began observing more carefully, and am shocked at the big sites that mysteriously lost all their page rank.  </p>
<p>We are seeing sites go from PR 7 or 6  &#8211;  to PR 0,<br />
not being dropped down slightly&#8230; just booted.</p>
<p>I find it quite unsettling, like changing the rules in the middle of the game, but not announcing what the new rules are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorvoja</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorvoja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-853</guid>
		<description>It would not make sense for Google to do so, there is nothing fishy about the link popularity of Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would not make sense for Google to do so, there is nothing fishy about the link popularity of Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web2innovations</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>web2innovations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-852</guid>
		<description>Even linkedwords.com, the huge contextual platform known to have tens of thousands of contextual links in - supposed to have a really high PR - had its PR zeroed; it is either change in the Google&#039;s algorithms or a temporary situation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even linkedwords.com, the huge contextual platform known to have tens of thousands of contextual links in &#8211; supposed to have a really high PR &#8211; had its PR zeroed; it is either change in the Google&#8217;s algorithms or a temporary situation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AM</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>AM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>...hope it&#039;s not a &quot;permanent cleansing&quot; for one of our sites.  Went from PR6 to PR0 (even though we&#039;re still PR6 at 24 datacenters).  The big concern is that our SERP for important keywords also has gone from 4 to not being in the top 100.

Guess we&#039;ll wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;hope it&#8217;s not a &#8220;permanent cleansing&#8221; for one of our sites.  Went from PR6 to PR0 (even though we&#8217;re still PR6 at 24 datacenters).  The big concern is that our SERP for important keywords also has gone from 4 to not being in the top 100.</p>
<p>Guess we&#8217;ll wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wit</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Wit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-850</guid>
		<description>...or they&#039;re making every page&#039;s PR read 0 before the green bar gets the boot at last. Cause a bit of a stir first LOL and give those PR-promising SEOs a last chance to make a quick buck.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or they&#8217;re making every page&#8217;s PR read 0 before the green bar gets the boot at last. Cause a bit of a stir first LOL and give those PR-promising SEOs a last chance to make a quick buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pittbug</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>pittbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>I see this happening on a lot of sites. It&#039;s almost like a cleansing before the new PR takes effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this happening on a lot of sites. It&#8217;s almost like a cleansing before the new PR takes effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mvandemar</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>mvandemar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/01/11/diggcom-pr0/#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Hm, Myspace.com seems to be losing it as well on many datacenters. 

-Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, Myspace.com seems to be losing it as well on many datacenters. </p>
<p>-Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
