<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Tool to Hide Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/</link>
	<description>SEO insiders share all on SEO news, tips and theories.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:35:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Everett</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-5234</link>
		<dc:creator>Everett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-5234</guid>
		<description>Donna you&#039;re a muse and Michael is a genius. It really doesn&#039;t get any easier than what this tool offers. Now, if search bots ever start parsing javascript there might be an issue, but I don&#039;t see that happening any time soon.

But if they do... Here&#039;s what I would suggest doing just in case. When you upload that javascript file to your server, be sure to put it into a folder that you keep just for these scripts (i.e. /scripts/). Also, don&#039;t forget to add that folder in the code that the tool gives you (i.e. /scripts/myscr...).

Now disallow the scripts folder in your robots.txt and you&#039;re double-safe. Again, I don&#039;t see the parsing of java on Google&#039;s radar any time soon, but it&#039;s good to think ahead.

And thanks for the compliment above. The only time I&#039;ve ever heard &quot;People like Everett Sizemore...&quot; used in a sentence was from a teacher or a judge - and neither was a good thing. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna you&#8217;re a muse and Michael is a genius. It really doesn&#8217;t get any easier than what this tool offers. Now, if search bots ever start parsing javascript there might be an issue, but I don&#8217;t see that happening any time soon.</p>
<p>But if they do&#8230; Here&#8217;s what I would suggest doing just in case. When you upload that javascript file to your server, be sure to put it into a folder that you keep just for these scripts (i.e. /scripts/). Also, don&#8217;t forget to add that folder in the code that the tool gives you (i.e. /scripts/myscr&#8230;).</p>
<p>Now disallow the scripts folder in your robots.txt and you&#8217;re double-safe. Again, I don&#8217;t see the parsing of java on Google&#8217;s radar any time soon, but it&#8217;s good to think ahead.</p>
<p>And thanks for the compliment above. The only time I&#8217;ve ever heard &#8220;People like Everett Sizemore&#8230;&#8221; used in a sentence was from a teacher or a judge &#8211; and neither was a good thing. <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Act out your sophisticated affiliate link paranoia</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>Act out your sophisticated affiliate link paranoia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>[...] If for some reasons you don&#8217;t want to detect crawlers, or it makes sound sense to hide ads from other Web robots too, you could encode your JavaScript ads. This way you deliver totally and utterly useless gibberish to anybody, and just browsers requesting a page will render the ads. Example: any sort of text or html block that you would like to encrypt and hide from snoops, scrapers, parasites, or bots, can be run through Michael&#8217;s Full Text/HTML Obfuscator Tool (hat tip to Donna). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If for some reasons you don&#8217;t want to detect crawlers, or it makes sound sense to hide ads from other Web robots too, you could encode your JavaScript ads. This way you deliver totally and utterly useless gibberish to anybody, and just browsers requesting a page will render the ads. Example: any sort of text or html block that you would like to encrypt and hide from snoops, scrapers, parasites, or bots, can be run through Michael&#8217;s Full Text/HTML Obfuscator Tool (hat tip to Donna). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamlet Batista</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamlet Batista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 01:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1907</guid>
		<description>Donna - Thank you very much for putting my name next to those giants ;-) Just getting a link back from you is a great honor.

Cheers,
Hamlet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna &#8211; Thank you very much for putting my name next to those giants <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Just getting a link back from you is a great honor.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Hamlet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>Good point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>lol...Hey Donna

Just didn&#039;t want a newb to grab this and shoot themselves in the foot.

Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol&#8230;Hey Donna</p>
<p>Just didn&#8217;t want a newb to grab this and shoot themselves in the foot.</p>
<p>Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>For what, Clint?  I mean, yes, obviously if you did this with your entire page&#039;s content, that would certainly destroy your rankings for that page.  Definitely DON&#039;T do that.  This is intended for maybe a couple of affiliate links, or a short blurb of text, or something like that, but not your entire content.  Ouch!  That would be brutal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what, Clint?  I mean, yes, obviously if you did this with your entire page&#8217;s content, that would certainly destroy your rankings for that page.  Definitely DON&#8217;T do that.  This is intended for maybe a couple of affiliate links, or a short blurb of text, or something like that, but not your entire content.  Ouch!  That would be brutal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/09/13/new-tool-to-hide-stuff/#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t this destroy search engine rankings???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t this destroy search engine rankings???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
