<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Admission of Guilt Will No Longer Be Required For Google Reconsideration Request</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/</link>
	<description>SEO insiders share all on SEO news, tips and theories.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:32:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seo consultants experts</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-7464</link>
		<dc:creator>seo consultants experts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-7464</guid>
		<description>I hope I never need reconsideration. Lol - great post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I never need reconsideration. Lol &#8211; great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-4714</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-4714</guid>
		<description>[...] This was important based on the discussion regarding Donna&#039;s reconsideration request. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This was important based on the discussion regarding Donna&#39;s reconsideration request. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Reconsideration Request Language Modified Again &#124; Smackdown!</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-4592</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Reconsideration Request Language Modified Again &#124; Smackdown!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-4592</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Reconsideration Request (formerly known as the Reinclusion Request), that were discussed on SEO Scoop back on December 3rd and here on Smackdown again on the 18th, have finally gone through. Essentially, the changes have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Reconsideration Request (formerly known as the Reinclusion Request), that were discussed on SEO Scoop back on December 3rd and here on Smackdown again on the 18th, have finally gone through. Essentially, the changes have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts Comes Through! (Well, Mostly&#8230;) &#124; Smackdown!</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts Comes Through! (Well, Mostly&#8230;) &#124; Smackdown!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned he started the ball rolling on, that DazzlinDonna posted about back on Dec 3rd, &#8220;Admission of Guilt Will No Longer Be Required For Google Reconsideration Request&#8220;, have indeed gone through. For the most part, that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned he started the ball rolling on, that DazzlinDonna posted about back on Dec 3rd, &#8220;Admission of Guilt Will No Longer Be Required For Google Reconsideration Request&#8220;, have indeed gone through. For the most part, that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wit</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>Wit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>LOL that text DID have a bit of a Spanish Inquisition ring to it - did it not? :) In fact it&#039;s a pity it&#039;s gone {sheds tear for the good old times}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL that text DID have a bit of a Spanish Inquisition ring to it &#8211; did it not? <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  In fact it&#8217;s a pity it&#8217;s gone {sheds tear for the good old times}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines &#38; Search Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines &#38; Search Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SearchCap: The Day In Search, December 3, 2007...&lt;/strong&gt;

Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SearchCap: The Day In Search, December 3, 2007&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rental Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Rental Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>Matt, sounds like you guys are either working on a tool for this or at least thinking of creating one to claim your content.  That&#039;s great!

I would think this issue would be a very hard one for Google to solve.

Thanks,
Dave Dugdale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, sounds like you guys are either working on a tool for this or at least thinking of creating one to claim your content.  That&#8217;s great!</p>
<p>I would think this issue would be a very hard one for Google to solve.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dave Dugdale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3075</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3075</guid>
		<description>Good show MV; and thanks, Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good show MV; and thanks, Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3074</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3074</guid>
		<description>Dave, other people have asked about tools to protect content or detect duplication or scraping. There&#039;s nothing to announce right now, but I have heard that feedback and would enjoy chatting with you about it at PubCon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, other people have asked about tools to protect content or detect duplication or scraping. There&#8217;s nothing to announce right now, but I have heard that feedback and would enjoy chatting with you about it at PubCon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines &#38; Search Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3072</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines &#38; Search Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/02/admission-of-guilt-will-no-longer-be-required-for-google-reconsideration-request/#comment-3072</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Answers More Questions On Paid Links...&lt;/strong&gt;

Information about buying and selling links that pass PageRank from the Google Webmaster Central blog answers more questions about the recent paid link regulations Google has set forth for their index. The main reason Google is going after paid links is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Answers More Questions On Paid Links&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Information about buying and selling links that pass PageRank from the Google Webmaster Central blog answers more questions about the recent paid link regulations Google has set forth for their index. The main reason Google is going after paid links is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
