<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobody Wants A Google-Friendly Link &#8211; At Any Price!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/</link>
	<description>SEO insiders share all on SEO news, tips and theories.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:34:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>Boris, you do realize that these links have nofollow on them, right?  Totally ok with Google...right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boris, you do realize that these links have nofollow on them, right?  Totally ok with Google&#8230;right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boris</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>Wow, this has been a lively conversation... I&#039;m on fan of wigets, but to have the created involved in this feedback was way cool. However, it does look like link buying and selling to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this has been a lively conversation&#8230; I&#8217;m on fan of wigets, but to have the created involved in this feedback was way cool. However, it does look like link buying and selling to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Rabinowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rabinowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>Donna, you have a great blog. I&#039;d take a link &quot;with or without sugar on top&quot; any day!
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna, you have a great blog. I&#8217;d take a link &#8220;with or without sugar on top&#8221; any day!<br />
 <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earlpearl</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3192</link>
		<dc:creator>earlpearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3192</guid>
		<description>I had been unaware of Scratchback until coming here a few days ago.  I&#039;ve since read through Jim&#039;s information, the directory and the comments here.

Its a terrific idea.  Over time, in one form or another, I&#039;ve &quot;tipped&quot;  those that have been of great help.  

This is a formal way to do it, and its nominal for most folks.

Of additional comment, Mike&#039;s ideas make enormous sense.  Predominately let the tippers see how much money and volume can be made by the recipients.

One last comment, relative to something Donna referenced at the top; amongts links and traffic to some business sites, I have a couple of links that happen to be no-follow for various reasons.  They were no-follow long before the recent issues with no-follow.

Two in particular are the best traffic generators to my site(s) after direct and major SE traffic.  One of the link sources is totally on topic.  One is very on-topic--but somewhat less on topic than the other.

Both generate more traffic than 2ndary SE&#039;s such as Ask or AOL.  Both generate not only traffic but conversions with the totally on topic link doing better than the second (expected).

I&#039;d go for highly relevant no-follow links any day of the week.  

It looks to be highly valuable, especially for blogs that are regularly helpful.  The whole thing makes loads of sense and to reiterate Mike&#039;s comments make lots of sense especially as it relates to spreading the info on the value to tippers and others interested in adding Scratchback.

Thanks for all the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been unaware of Scratchback until coming here a few days ago.  I&#8217;ve since read through Jim&#8217;s information, the directory and the comments here.</p>
<p>Its a terrific idea.  Over time, in one form or another, I&#8217;ve &#8220;tipped&#8221;  those that have been of great help.  </p>
<p>This is a formal way to do it, and its nominal for most folks.</p>
<p>Of additional comment, Mike&#8217;s ideas make enormous sense.  Predominately let the tippers see how much money and volume can be made by the recipients.</p>
<p>One last comment, relative to something Donna referenced at the top; amongts links and traffic to some business sites, I have a couple of links that happen to be no-follow for various reasons.  They were no-follow long before the recent issues with no-follow.</p>
<p>Two in particular are the best traffic generators to my site(s) after direct and major SE traffic.  One of the link sources is totally on topic.  One is very on-topic&#8211;but somewhat less on topic than the other.</p>
<p>Both generate more traffic than 2ndary SE&#8217;s such as Ask or AOL.  Both generate not only traffic but conversions with the totally on topic link doing better than the second (expected).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d go for highly relevant no-follow links any day of the week.  </p>
<p>It looks to be highly valuable, especially for blogs that are regularly helpful.  The whole thing makes loads of sense and to reiterate Mike&#8217;s comments make lots of sense especially as it relates to spreading the info on the value to tippers and others interested in adding Scratchback.</p>
<p>Thanks for all the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3169</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 23:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3169</guid>
		<description>Custom landing pages is on the list mvandemar. Thanks for thinking of it though. 

As I said before, there&#039;s so many things we want to do, but only enough time in the day to do some of them. So right now we&#039;re prioritizing and focusing on one or two main things.

Great idea though, and definitely something we will do.

Check out the buy page, we updated it a bit with a friendlier graphic/explanation. It&#039;s a start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Custom landing pages is on the list mvandemar. Thanks for thinking of it though. </p>
<p>As I said before, there&#8217;s so many things we want to do, but only enough time in the day to do some of them. So right now we&#8217;re prioritizing and focusing on one or two main things.</p>
<p>Great idea though, and definitely something we will do.</p>
<p>Check out the buy page, we updated it a bit with a friendlier graphic/explanation. It&#8217;s a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mvandemar</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3167</link>
		<dc:creator>mvandemar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3167</guid>
		<description>Oh, Jim, I have no idea if you are checking back on these comments or not, but I just had another idea that I think would probably help quite a bit as well...

Reading Lea&#039;s comment is what gave it to me (thanks Lea! :D). Customizable, brandable, landing pages. Allow people to do some simple modifications to their own landing pages with a logo and approved sales pitch.  I&#039;m thinking all you would really need would be a very simple interface consisting of a place to put in a logo url and a textarea for the custom text. The landing page you have now heavily emphasizes &quot;tipping&quot;, whereas on professional blogs I think &quot;cheap advertising&quot; might actually be a better plug. Either way, it would allow each publisher a little more control and say in what their audience sees when clicking on the links.

For instance, I have a &quot;What&#039;s this?&quot; link underneath the widget on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bad-neighborhood.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bad Neighborhood&lt;/a&gt; which leads to a page explaining what the widget is for, but far more people click on the actual widget itself than do the explanation link. I have a hunch that if the landing page had my logo and a slant towards the advertising value of the &quot;tip&quot; then there could very well be a better conversion ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Jim, I have no idea if you are checking back on these comments or not, but I just had another idea that I think would probably help quite a bit as well&#8230;</p>
<p>Reading Lea&#8217;s comment is what gave it to me (thanks Lea! <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> ). Customizable, brandable, landing pages. Allow people to do some simple modifications to their own landing pages with a logo and approved sales pitch.  I&#8217;m thinking all you would really need would be a very simple interface consisting of a place to put in a logo url and a textarea for the custom text. The landing page you have now heavily emphasizes &#8220;tipping&#8221;, whereas on professional blogs I think &#8220;cheap advertising&#8221; might actually be a better plug. Either way, it would allow each publisher a little more control and say in what their audience sees when clicking on the links.</p>
<p>For instance, I have a &#8220;What&#8217;s this?&#8221; link underneath the widget on <a href="http://www.bad-neighborhood.com/" rel="nofollow">Bad Neighborhood</a> which leads to a page explaining what the widget is for, but far more people click on the actual widget itself than do the explanation link. I have a hunch that if the landing page had my logo and a slant towards the advertising value of the &#8220;tip&#8221; then there could very well be a better conversion ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hikdis57 (Over Googled)</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>hikdis57 (Over Googled)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>Well, I love the widgets and the http://www.Nemeas.com SEO software I use, but...

I am still not sure the cost is the holdback, as much as not knowing how it will effect my readers to see yet another (misunderstood or questionable) sidget staring them in the face.

I guess I need to really get a better understanding first, and that has certainly started with this great post of yours.  Since this thing is for 99% of people I think I will send this link out to my entire readership.

Again, thanks for the insight, and...

Merry Christmas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I love the widgets and the <a href="http://www.Nemeas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Nemeas.com</a> SEO software I use, but&#8230;</p>
<p>I am still not sure the cost is the holdback, as much as not knowing how it will effect my readers to see yet another (misunderstood or questionable) sidget staring them in the face.</p>
<p>I guess I need to really get a better understanding first, and that has certainly started with this great post of yours.  Since this thing is for 99% of people I think I will send this link out to my entire readership.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for the insight, and&#8230;</p>
<p>Merry Christmas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea de Groot</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3152</link>
		<dc:creator>Lea de Groot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3152</guid>
		<description>Well, I have this morbid aversion to sidebar widgets :) but if I switch off the visual blankspot in my brain and turn on my &#039;naive visitor&#039; settings, my first impression  is &#039;what is this?&#039; ... and clicking through didn&#039;t tell me.
There&#039;s a link (&#039;tip&#039;) that seems to be unconnected to the list of links that appears to let me send Donna money (and I love you, Donna, but I&#039;m not sending you cash :-P) but when I click through it wants me sign up for some sort of link exchange deal (this is my &#039;naive visitor&#039;s hat&#039; impression)

And theres a &#039;get your own&#039; link that takes me through to a signup page. I may not like a  hard sell, but this seems ridiculously far the other way - shouldn&#039;t you tell me what I am signing up for?
I think you need to revamp the overall navigation on that page (if not the site - I haven&#039;t looked through it to thoroughly yet) to target it to &#039;new visitor who doesn&#039;t know what scratchback is&#039;

What Michael says about the widget itself makes sense, too :)

Hope it helps! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have this morbid aversion to sidebar widgets <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but if I switch off the visual blankspot in my brain and turn on my &#8216;naive visitor&#8217; settings, my first impression  is &#8216;what is this?&#8217; &#8230; and clicking through didn&#8217;t tell me.<br />
There&#8217;s a link (&#8217;tip&#8217;) that seems to be unconnected to the list of links that appears to let me send Donna money (and I love you, Donna, but I&#8217;m not sending you cash <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> ) but when I click through it wants me sign up for some sort of link exchange deal (this is my &#8216;naive visitor&#8217;s hat&#8217; impression)</p>
<p>And theres a &#8216;get your own&#8217; link that takes me through to a signup page. I may not like a  hard sell, but this seems ridiculously far the other way &#8211; shouldn&#8217;t you tell me what I am signing up for?<br />
I think you need to revamp the overall navigation on that page (if not the site &#8211; I haven&#8217;t looked through it to thoroughly yet) to target it to &#8216;new visitor who doesn&#8217;t know what scratchback is&#8217;</p>
<p>What Michael says about the widget itself makes sense, too <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hope it helps! <img src='http://www.seo-scoop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier Vespa</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3146</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier Vespa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 02:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3146</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used topspots something like two weeks ago.

Basically, I paid a buck, and got maybe two or three clicks.
However, my link is still there on the page, so there&#039;s more to come.

I&#039;ve just paid five bucks on this blog and we&#039;ll see how it goes.
(5 bucks is expensive though)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used topspots something like two weeks ago.</p>
<p>Basically, I paid a buck, and got maybe two or three clicks.<br />
However, my link is still there on the page, so there&#8217;s more to come.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just paid five bucks on this blog and we&#8217;ll see how it goes.<br />
(5 bucks is expensive though)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/12/06/nobody-wants-a-google-friendly-link-at-any-price/#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>I will give you a good example of why it is use-full. 

I have been meaning to go back and check out more of MR SEo&#039;s podcasts but you know how busy we get and forget. 

But when I saw his link here, I go Oh Yeah I forgot about that and clicked the link. 

And in the meantime clicked a couple more and bookmarked your site as a good resource . 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will give you a good example of why it is use-full. </p>
<p>I have been meaning to go back and check out more of MR SEo&#8217;s podcasts but you know how busy we get and forget. </p>
<p>But when I saw his link here, I go Oh Yeah I forgot about that and clicked the link. </p>
<p>And in the meantime clicked a couple more and bookmarked your site as a good resource . </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
